EDITOR'S CHOICE
Top picks from our editors
Cryptocurrency News
2 min

Feb 1, 2026
newsbot
Charles Hoskinson on Hash vs Lattice-Based Cryptography
Charles Hoskinson discusses the differences between hash-based and lattice-based cryptography, emphasizing Cardano's reliance on lattice solutions. He highlights the recent "poisoned transaction" hack and its implications for network security. The ongoing debate between these cryptographic approaches raises questions about the future of blockchain technology.
1

In a recent discussion, Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson delved into the contrasting worlds of hash-based and lattice-based cryptography. With Ethereum leaning towards STARKs and hash-based solutions, Cardano is charting a different course by focusing on lattice-based cryptography. This divergence has sparked a comparison reminiscent of the Blu-ray versus HD DVD format wars; only time will reveal which technology will dominate.
Hoskinson's insights come at a crucial time, especially following November's infamous "poisoned transaction" hack that nearly derailed Cardano's operations. He emphasized that had Cardano been a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT)-based network, the consequences could have been catastrophic. Instead, the architecture allowed the platform to remain resilient against such threats.
The conversation around cryptographic methods is gaining momentum as the crypto landscape evolves. With projects like Ethereum adopting hash-based systems, the debate is no longer just about technology but also about security, scalability, and the future direction of blockchain networks. Hoskinson's advocacy for lattice-based solutions is rooted in their potential to provide enhanced security against quantum computing threats, a concern that looms large in the crypto community.
This shift in focus has implications beyond just technical specifications. It raises questions about user trust, data integrity, and the overall robustness of blockchain ecosystems. Hoskinson argued that while hash-based systems have their merits, they may not be sufficient for the challenges that lie ahead.
As the crypto market continues to fluctuate, with Bitcoin and Ethereum experiencing minor changes in their prices, the importance of choosing the right cryptographic approach becomes even more apparent. Current market data reflects a cautious optimism, yet concerns over security vulnerabilities remain at the forefront.
In the end, the choice between hash-based and lattice-based cryptography will likely shape the future of blockchain. As projects vie for dominance, the effectiveness of their cryptographic methods will play a pivotal role in their success or failure. For now, Cardano is steadfast in its commitment to lattice-based solutions, and only time will tell if this choice pays off in the long run.
READ MORE
Cryptocurrency News
Charles Hoskinson on Hash vs Lattice-Based Cryptography
Dec 23, 2025
Charles Hoskinson discusses the differences between hash-based and lattice-based cryptography, emphasizing Cardano's reliance on lattice solutions. He highlights the recent "poisoned transaction" hack and its implications for network security. The ongoing debate between these cryptographic approaches raises questions about the future of blockchain technology.
1

In a recent discussion, Cardano co-founder Charles Hoskinson delved into the contrasting worlds of hash-based and lattice-based cryptography. With Ethereum leaning towards STARKs and hash-based solutions, Cardano is charting a different course by focusing on lattice-based cryptography. This divergence has sparked a comparison reminiscent of the Blu-ray versus HD DVD format wars; only time will reveal which technology will dominate.
Hoskinson's insights come at a crucial time, especially following November's infamous "poisoned transaction" hack that nearly derailed Cardano's operations. He emphasized that had Cardano been a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT)-based network, the consequences could have been catastrophic. Instead, the architecture allowed the platform to remain resilient against such threats.
The conversation around cryptographic methods is gaining momentum as the crypto landscape evolves. With projects like Ethereum adopting hash-based systems, the debate is no longer just about technology but also about security, scalability, and the future direction of blockchain networks. Hoskinson's advocacy for lattice-based solutions is rooted in their potential to provide enhanced security against quantum computing threats, a concern that looms large in the crypto community.
This shift in focus has implications beyond just technical specifications. It raises questions about user trust, data integrity, and the overall robustness of blockchain ecosystems. Hoskinson argued that while hash-based systems have their merits, they may not be sufficient for the challenges that lie ahead.
As the crypto market continues to fluctuate, with Bitcoin and Ethereum experiencing minor changes in their prices, the importance of choosing the right cryptographic approach becomes even more apparent. Current market data reflects a cautious optimism, yet concerns over security vulnerabilities remain at the forefront.
In the end, the choice between hash-based and lattice-based cryptography will likely shape the future of blockchain. As projects vie for dominance, the effectiveness of their cryptographic methods will play a pivotal role in their success or failure. For now, Cardano is steadfast in its commitment to lattice-based solutions, and only time will tell if this choice pays off in the long run.
READ MORE
© 2025 by AltcoinStory. All rights reserved.









